This is only my second blog, but I have an observation. Blogging is like book publishing. Here are a few reasons:
(1) Publication Proliferation: According to The Blog Herald, as of July, 2008 there were 70 million blogs. That’s around one blog for every four people in the United States. There seems to be some logic in Despair, Inc.'s blog observation: "Never before have so many people with so little to say said so much to so few"
(1) Publication Proliferation: According to The Blog Herald, as of July, 2008 there were 70 million blogs. That’s around one blog for every four people in the United States. There seems to be some logic in Despair, Inc.'s blog observation: "Never before have so many people with so little to say said so much to so few"
Book publishers launch around 200,000 new books a year. So every year we add a lot of books to the millions of books that publishers already have in their catalogs from many years of publishing.
(2) Content is King: You have to have great content that resonates with at least a distinct audience. For example, people that might care about this blog are those in the publishing business that blog. I will probably not set any traffic records with this blog.
(3) Building Awareness: Great content, however, is not enough. There is a lot of great content that never gets published and even content that gets published but is never read. I suspect like book publishing, blog awareness gets largely built through viral marketing; someone likes what they have read and then passes it along to someone else. Overtime you build a following. Having a major platform along with great content that people care about would seem to be a winning combination, and that's similar to book publishing.
(4) Distribution: Distribution applies to the blogging world, but traditional brick and mortar distribution channels it is not. It is still, however, about getting your message and content in as many places as possible so it can be exposed to as many people as possible. - Still wrestling with how that one is different from building awareness, but I think that like getting various retailers to carry your book, you need to have various people/influencers willing to discuss, link to and promote your blog.
There is at least one way that blogging is not like book publishing - The cost of publishing. The cost to get into blogging and communicating your ideas and content is pretty cheap, assuming you have a computer. It is mostly just your time and the opportunity cost of that time. That explains 70 million blogs.
As a book publisher, this leaves me to wonder...what is our role as content consumption trends towards more digital forms of media? My hunch is that we will continue to be experts at recognizing great content, have an even sharper of eye for matching the most effective delivery vehicle for the content's intended audiences and then maximizing awareness. It's not that different than what we do today in some ways but completely different in other ways.
I would love to hear your thoughts on blogging and publishing.
6 comments:
Tod,
Great observations about blogging and publishing-
Here is a thought- what if you attached a print pdf to your blog of any number of our titles for a price of say $4.95 for those who want to read on line?
I also think you should blog about your international publishing experiences especially in Brazil.
Thanks
Another possible point is that even with a small intended audience a book-blog can be effective and powerful. You already alluded to some blogs not being traffic drivers. But the "right" traffic is what matters in this world of niches!
Love the line from Despair.com--so true! I wonder if part of the 200,000 books published each year are tiltes that are self-published through a print-on-demand company such as LuLu or Xulon. Like bloggers, there are many self-published authors who care more about seeing their words in print than providing content/inspiration/help that others actually want. If a tree falls in a forest but no one is there, does it make a sound? Likewise, if a blogger blogs but no comes to read, is it meaningful?
I think one of the things blogs are doing is shortening our attention span. People are consuming content differently than they did a decade ago. I think long-form media will eventually be the exception, expect when it comes to fiction. Time will tell.
Good post, Tod (still trying to encourage your budding blog business)!
I agree with Mike's assessment on our attention spans shrinking. To me, that's still the real difference between book publishing and blogging. People who read blogs are generally looking for short snippets (even shorter snippets are expected on Facebook or Twitter) of content. I won't read blog posts longer than six or seven paragraphs, for instance (unless it's on YOUR blog). It seems like the writer is going on and on when it requires scrolling down the web page.
There are some genres of content which I am happy to access only online (self-help, Christian thought, cooking, interior design, history, and biography). What's driving this for me is that I prefer to get only snippets of those books and won't ever read them cover-to-cover. Other books still are most appealing to me in printed form (children's picture books, Bibles, fiction, and gift/art/photo books). These books are ones where the formatting (pictures, font style, graphic design elements) is important or where I read it cover to cover and enjoy holding it in my hand. I could see myself converting to fiction in e-book form at some point down the road, simply for ease of traveling with multiple books.
Generally, we're all in information overload mode. Although a way to fix that is to take in less information, I think sitting down and reading a book vs. getting info off the internet still provides a less-stimulating way to learn. Reading hard copy books may be the ultra-guilty-pleasure of the 21st century!
I agree with Tom's suggestion that you could blog about your publishing experience, as well as your times in Brazil in the printing industry.
Bloggers are like modern day jesters, in the sense included in Wikipedia, and their opinions are needed:
"In societies where freedom of speech was not recognized as a right, the court jester - precisely because anything he said was by definition "a jest" and "the uttering of a fool" - could speak frankly on controversial issues[3] in a way in which anyone else would have been severely punished for, and monarchs understood the usefulness of having such a person at their side.[4]" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jester
Thanks
Post a Comment